ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT
Mumbai)
It is generally seen that there may be several stages or
events arising in a joint development arrangement made
between owner of the land and the developer. For the
purpose of determining the actual date of transfer of the
land by the land owner, all these stages / events needs to
be collectively analsysed and after evaluating overall
effect of the same we can determine the actual date of
transfer. These stages / events may be described as date of
entering into JDA, date of executing power of attorney authorizing the developer for taking various approvals /
permissions etc., handing over the possession of the land
to the developer for various purposes, receipt of part /
full sale consideration from the developer, date of
execution of power of attorney in favour of developer authorizing him for the sale of developed units to the
customers at his absolute discretion; and transfer of
developed units to the customers etc. There may be few more
stages / events to complete the transaction. Though, one
single event may trigger the process of transfer but may
not necessarily complete it also. Whether the transfer has,
in substance, taken place, can be determined by analyzing
the inter-play and effect of all these stages / events
combined and put together. For example, possession may be
given for various purposes, viz. possession given to a
contractor, or to a tenant also, but such an event in
itself cannot be regarded as “transfer” of
land. Possession of land may also be handed over as licensee
only for the purpose of development of real estate on land.
Here again, it shall not give rise to
“transfer”. Thus, when the possession is given
along with other legal rights to the developer resulting
into entitlement of the developer for full use and
enjoyment of the property as well as its further sale after
converting it into developed units at its full, own and
sole discretion, then it may result into
‘transfer’ provided other conditions also
suggest so. Thus, handing over of the possession has to be
necessarily coupled with the intention of transferring the
rights of ownership and enjoyment of the property to the
developer. Handing over of the possession for the limited
purpose of developing the land while still retaining the
ownership and control of various legal rights upon the
property by the land owner would not fall in clause (v) of
section 2(47)